UN cybercrime treaty to be signed in Hanoi to tackle global offences

 :A landmark United Nations cybercrime treaty was signed in Hanoi, Vietnam, on October 25, 2025, with representatives from over 60 countries participating. This treaty, officially known as the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime, marks the first global legal framework aimed at combating cybercrimes such as phishing, ransomware, online trafficking, and hate speech, which collectively cost the global economy trillions of dollars annually. 

Reuters

Key Details

Adoption and Ratification: The treaty was adopted by the UN General Assembly in December 2024 and will come into effect once ratified by at least 40 countries. 

The Record from Recorded Future

International Cooperation: It seeks to enhance international collaboration in prosecuting cyber offenses, facilitating the sharing of electronic evidence, and strengthening the capacity of law enforcement agencies, particularly in developing nations. 

UNODC

Human Rights Concerns: Despite its objectives, the treaty has faced criticism from human rights organizations and tech companies like Meta and Microsoft. Critics argue that its broad definitions of cybercrime could lead to expanded state surveillance and the criminalization of ethical hacking. 

Reuters

Vietnam's Role: Vietnam, which hosted the signing ceremony, views the treaty as an opportunity to bolster its cyber defenses amid rising cyberattacks on critical infrastructure. 

Reuters

Global Reactions

Support: Countries like the United States, Canada, and members of the European Union have expressed support for the treaty, emphasizing the need for a unified approach to combat cybercrime. 

The Record from Recorded Future

Opposition: Human rights groups and technology firms have voiced concerns over potential abuses stemming from the treaty's implementation, particularly regarding privacy and freedom of expression. 

Reuters

As nations proceed with the ratification process, the treaty's impact on global cybercrime enforcement and individual freedoms remains a topic of ongoing debate.